Predictors of adherence in Austrian employees during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of an online survey.

Background: Since the beginning of the pandemic in December 2019, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a significant challenge to health care systems throughout the world. The introduction of measures to reduce the incidence of infection had a significant impact on the workplace. Overall, companies played a key and adaptive role in coping with the pandemic. Methods: Cross-sectional data from an online-survey of 1,183 employees conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2021 in Austria were used in the analyses. The influence of health beliefs (e.g., perceived severity), modifying factors (e.g., age) and time-dependent factors (e.g., corona fatigue) on individual adherence were evaluated. The conception of the questionnaire was based on the health belief model. Results: The majority of respondents were female (58.3%), worked in companies with more than 250 employees (56.6%) and had been to an academic secondary school or had a university degree (58.3%). Overall, employees were adherent to most of the measures at their company (>80%), except for wearing FFP-2 masks when they were travelling in a car with coworkers (59.3, 95%CI 51.3-66.7%). Overall adherence was associated with high ratings for the meaningfulness of testing (OR: 2.06 95%CI: 1.00-4.22; p = 0.049), the extent to which social norms govern behavior (OR: 6.61 95%CI: 4.66-9.36; p < 0.001), lower perceived difficulties associated with the adoption of health-promoting measures (OR: 0.37 95%CI: 0.16-0.82; p = 0.015) and lower corona fatigue (OR: 0.23 95%CI: 0.10-0.52; p < 0.001). Adherence to four single measures was influenced by different predictors. The most important predictors (important for the adherence to three out of four single measures) were social norms and corona fatigue. Conclusion: The importance attached to testing and social norms, as well as lower perceived barriers to health-promoting measures and low levels of corona fatigue all increase overall adherence to Covid-19 protective measures in companies. Strategies to improve adherence should be adapted depending on the aim (to raise overall adherence or adherence to individual measures) and on the group of persons that is being targeted.

Comparison of Pre- and Postoperative Motor-proprioceptive Abilities in Patients with Gonarthrosis. / Vergleich prä- und postoperativer motorisch-propriozeptiver Fähigkeiten von Patienten mit Gonarthrose.

Both surgeons and patients want to achieve a high level of satisfaction and the best possible functional results within a short time after knee TEP surgery. By using a tool that digitally records various measurement parameters of balance and motor function preoperatively and postoperatively on a mobile basis and with little time expenditure, progressive results can be compared. Individual factors can thus be determined and these can influence the progress in regeneration and training progress perioperatively.In a prospective study, 100 patients before and 66 patients after installation of a cement-retained knee TEP were evaluated for the following parameters: balance, maximum strength, and power. All measurements were performed with the KMP measurement platform from MotoSana. The second measurements were performed in each case after a standardised follow-up treatment.It was shown that there are significant relationships between personal factors such as age, height, body weight and with baseline values and performance measures: maximum strength and power. Furthermore, it was shown that postoperative improvement could be achieved for the most part around balance support. All patients who previously had to hold on with one hand or both hands no longer needed support after surgery to maintain the single-leg stance for the specified time of 15 s. For a more detailed analysis of the balance parameters, the samples were adjusted and only the patients who did not hold on for support pre- and postoperatively were counted. In patients with low and medium initial stance, the sway area increased at the second measurement session, and in patients with large sway areas, it decreased, and the stance became more stable. In the area of maximum strength and power, patients with high baseline values still had higher values after AHB compared with the other patients, but lower values compared with their own baseline values.Patients who already had very good motor skills before surgery were able to achieve a greater increase in motor skills compared to the weaker group. However, all patients failed to reach their preoperative baseline values after completion of the AHB. Deficits in balance were still detectable in all groups. By using the presented force plate, measurement-based coordinated rehabilitation procedures are possible during and after completion of the AHB. Rehabilitation with individualised improvement of balance and motor function could be expected to prevent dissatisfaction after knee arthroplasty, e.g. due to muscular imbalance in femoropatellar pain syndromes.

Predictors for adherent behavior in the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional telephone survey.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, protective measures have been prescribed to prevent or slow down the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and protect the population. Individuals follow these measures to varying degrees. We aimed to identify factors influencing the extent to which protective measures are adhered to. Methods: A cross-sectional survey (telephone interviews) was undertaken between April and June 2021 to identify factors influencing the degree to which individuals adhere to protective measures. A representative sample of 1,003 people (age >16 years) in two Austrian states (Carinthia, Vorarlberg) was interviewed. The questionnaire was based on the Health Belief Model, but also included potential response-modifying factors. Predictors for adherent behavior were identified using multiple regression analysis. All predictors were standardized so that regression coefficients (ß) could be compared. Results: Overall median adherence was 0.75 (IQR: 0.5-1.0). Based on a regression model, the following variables were identified as significant in raising adherence: higher age (ß = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.33-0.54), social standards of acceptable behavior (ß = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.27-0.40), subjective/individual assessment of an increased personal health risk (ß = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.05-0.18), self-efficacy (ß = 0.06, 95%CI: 0.02-0.10), female gender (ß = 0.05, 95%CI: 0.01-0.08), and low corona fatigue (behavioral fatigue: ß = -0.11, 95%CI: -0.18 to -0.03). The model showed that such aspects as personal trust in institutions, perceived difficulties in adopting health-promoting measures, and individual assessments of the risk of infection, had no significant influence. Conclusions: This study reveals that several factors significantly influence adherence to measures aimed at controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. To enhance adherence, the government, media, and other relevant stakeholders should take the findings into consideration when formulating policy. By developing social standards and promoting self-efficacy, individuals can influence the behavior of others and contribute toward coping with the pandemic.

Prospective pilot study to identify psychological factors influencing peri-operative pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

PURPOSE: Up to 20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients remain dissatisfied, with chronic pain as the most frequently named cause. A pilot study was conducted to assess the progression of peri-operative pain intensity and the parallel development of different psychological factors and coping strategies, as well as correlations indicating potential inter-relationships. METHODS: Pain, psychological impairment [FESV BE], and coping strategies [FESV BW] were assessed before and after TKA [days - 5 to 31]. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of peri-operative pain improvement [decreasing pain: Group 1 [69%; n = 36]; persisting pain: group 2 [31%; n = 16]]. Group 2 was additionally tested with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale [TAS] and Screening for Somatoform Disorders [SOMS]. RESULTS: Pain intensity in group 1 decreased from significantly higher pre-operative levels to significantly lower values at 31 days post-operatively, whereas group 2 did not show significant changes. Concurrently, the psychological impairment parameter anxiety (AN) significantly decreased and the pain coping parameter relaxation significantly increased in group 1, but not in group 2. Whereas pre-operative pain was positively and significantly correlated with AN throughout time in group 2, it was negatively correlated with relaxation at day 29 in group 1. Concerning TAS and SOMS, considerable percentages of the participants in group 2 (37.5% and 68.75%, respectively) showed values > 50% of those in normal controls. CONCLUSIONS: Parallel (or anti-parallel) and partially correlated developments of pain improvement and parameters of psychological impairment or coping strategies after TKA suggest a pre-operative screening with tools like the FESV BE and BW or TAS and SOMS questionnaires in order to classify individuals for peri-operative mental training.